Change is not only inevitable, it’s essential to our success in business. When facing a change one of the most important elements is to have a clear vision. The lack of one can have disastrous effects. A vision must be not only clear but also well defined. It should only take a few minutes to communicate it to others. At the end of the presentation it should indicate their understanding and provoke their interest. Before a vision can inspire and be shared by others, it has to inspire the leader. It must be in harmony with the leader’s own values, and he must be willing to set an example with his own actions. It’s the leader’s task to convey the image of an exciting future to others, appealing to shared values and aspirations, thusly enlisting them to share the vision.
One way for an able leader to avoid the potential pitfalls of change is to always be aware of what’s going on around him. A good way of doing that is to listen. A good leader knows that observing and listening to others can provide valuable information. This information can prove crucial when dealing with change. Another way for a skilled leader to avoid the hazards of change is to look for new opportunities and be willing to take risks for the sake of change. In other words, a good leader knows that change is not only inevitable, but necessary for growth and survival, so he looks for change.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Monday, November 15, 2010
Team Formation and Team Leadership in Traditional and Virtual Teams
Consider your relationship with your employees. Do you have a connection with them? Nemiro (2004, p.40) stresses the importance of relationships formed by true team leaders. She states that positions (as well as the people who fill them) may come and go, but effective relationships have the power to influence people. It’s the connection created by a relationship that can inspire and persuade.
One of the more basic, but very effective, ways for a team leader to build relationships is to make an effort to connect with people. Taking the time to talk to someone and to really listen can not only strengthen the relationship, but it can provide insight and information that may prove to be an invaluable resource. We can’t possibly know all of someone’s strengths, talents, and interests simply by reading their file. A personal connection can reveal so much more. It can also inspire the other person to go the extra mile when we need it the most. Remember that virtual team members need and deserve the same attention and feedback as those who are part of more traditional teams (Duarte, 2006, p.76). If you’ve ever experienced leadership of those who showed genuine interest in each member of the group, as well as of those who seemed to distance themselves from the rest, fostering an “us vs. them” atmosphere, then you know the effectiveness of the two approaches was quite different.
Duarte (2006, p.85) notes that trust is often thought of in the context of long-term relationships. When people join together for a short period of time, building and maintaining trust is more difficult, which makes it that much more important and valuable. Limited (or non-existent) face-to-face contact can have an alienating effect on team members. As a leader of a virtual team, one must put forth “conscious and planned effort” into facilitating the feelings of trust among the team. Trust is a big component of true and effective teamwork. Consider a leader with a belief that if she keeps things from the team, she holds the key to power. Her lies and secrecy will have the potential for a tremendously negative effect on the team. Lacking cohesiveness, the team may easily fall apart before anything is accomplished.
Choosing the right leadership structure should be at the forefront of every leader. Considering the team members’ skills and values, as well as aligning the team’s vision, objectives, and tasks will enhance the team’s effectiveness (Nemiro, 2004, p.40). An effective leader will be able to assess the various aspects of the team, its members, and its objectives and choose the most effective structure. An “absent leader” who neglects to provide the needed support is as frustrating as a micro-manager who constantly interrupts when independent work can be performed. On the other hand, providing the right amount of autonomy, support, and feedback can foster creativity and success.
Duarte , D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2006). Mastering virtual teams: Strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Nemiro, J. E. (2004). Creativity in virtual teams: Key components for success. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
One of the more basic, but very effective, ways for a team leader to build relationships is to make an effort to connect with people. Taking the time to talk to someone and to really listen can not only strengthen the relationship, but it can provide insight and information that may prove to be an invaluable resource. We can’t possibly know all of someone’s strengths, talents, and interests simply by reading their file. A personal connection can reveal so much more. It can also inspire the other person to go the extra mile when we need it the most. Remember that virtual team members need and deserve the same attention and feedback as those who are part of more traditional teams (Duarte, 2006, p.76). If you’ve ever experienced leadership of those who showed genuine interest in each member of the group, as well as of those who seemed to distance themselves from the rest, fostering an “us vs. them” atmosphere, then you know the effectiveness of the two approaches was quite different.
Duarte (2006, p.85) notes that trust is often thought of in the context of long-term relationships. When people join together for a short period of time, building and maintaining trust is more difficult, which makes it that much more important and valuable. Limited (or non-existent) face-to-face contact can have an alienating effect on team members. As a leader of a virtual team, one must put forth “conscious and planned effort” into facilitating the feelings of trust among the team. Trust is a big component of true and effective teamwork. Consider a leader with a belief that if she keeps things from the team, she holds the key to power. Her lies and secrecy will have the potential for a tremendously negative effect on the team. Lacking cohesiveness, the team may easily fall apart before anything is accomplished.
Choosing the right leadership structure should be at the forefront of every leader. Considering the team members’ skills and values, as well as aligning the team’s vision, objectives, and tasks will enhance the team’s effectiveness (Nemiro, 2004, p.40). An effective leader will be able to assess the various aspects of the team, its members, and its objectives and choose the most effective structure. An “absent leader” who neglects to provide the needed support is as frustrating as a micro-manager who constantly interrupts when independent work can be performed. On the other hand, providing the right amount of autonomy, support, and feedback can foster creativity and success.
Duarte , D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2006). Mastering virtual teams: Strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Nemiro, J. E. (2004). Creativity in virtual teams: Key components for success. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Power
Power is often defined as simply the ability to act, but power can be quite complicated. Many people want it, but not all who have it know what to do with it. Some abuse it, while others use it quite constructively. We’ve all heard the old adage that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Being a leader/manager comes with a certain amount of power, so it’s your responsibility to understand it and use it in a manner that will optimize the results of your efforts.
There are two kinds of power that are worth considering by anyone in a leadership position: positional power and personal power (Reardon 2001). Lets take a look at both.
Reardon (2001, p. 150) defines positional power as having to do with “how much formal power people perceive you to have”. Reardon further states that positional power comes in a variety of forms – status, visibility, centrality, relevance, job cachet, and autonomy. This suggests that one doesn’t necessarily have to be in management to enjoy some form of positional power.
Although your management position automatically affords you some level of power, the other factors can contribute considerably. While your current position is what it is, what you do with it is up to you. Being visible and involved* will contribute to the way others see you in a much more favorable way than being secluded and appearing non-interested would. Pay attention to the power that your current position gives you and what you’re actively and consciously doing with it.
Personal power refers to “traits and skills that make people influential” (Reardon, 2001, p. 165). Some achieve personal power through the means of expertise, dedication, or positive impression, while others rely on having the right amount of confidence or skillfully mirroring those in power. Regardless of which personal power traits or skills we utilize, the end goal is the same – to influence those around us in ways that will benefit us.
Do you have skills and expertise? Do people see you as committed and dedicated? Do you project confidence? Do you empower others? These are all very important questions as they are a crucial part of personal power. Take the time to examine your answers and formulate your plan of action.
Keep in mind that whether considering positional or personal power, you have the ability to affect it in your favor. You actions affect others’ perceptions of you. Those perceptions, in turn, will contribute to how much power they believe you to have.
*Being involved is not the same as micro-managing.
Reardon, K.K. (2001). The Secret Handshake: Mastering The Politics Of The Business Inner Circle. New York: Doubleday.
There are two kinds of power that are worth considering by anyone in a leadership position: positional power and personal power (Reardon 2001). Lets take a look at both.
Reardon (2001, p. 150) defines positional power as having to do with “how much formal power people perceive you to have”. Reardon further states that positional power comes in a variety of forms – status, visibility, centrality, relevance, job cachet, and autonomy. This suggests that one doesn’t necessarily have to be in management to enjoy some form of positional power.
Although your management position automatically affords you some level of power, the other factors can contribute considerably. While your current position is what it is, what you do with it is up to you. Being visible and involved* will contribute to the way others see you in a much more favorable way than being secluded and appearing non-interested would. Pay attention to the power that your current position gives you and what you’re actively and consciously doing with it.
Personal power refers to “traits and skills that make people influential” (Reardon, 2001, p. 165). Some achieve personal power through the means of expertise, dedication, or positive impression, while others rely on having the right amount of confidence or skillfully mirroring those in power. Regardless of which personal power traits or skills we utilize, the end goal is the same – to influence those around us in ways that will benefit us.
Do you have skills and expertise? Do people see you as committed and dedicated? Do you project confidence? Do you empower others? These are all very important questions as they are a crucial part of personal power. Take the time to examine your answers and formulate your plan of action.
Keep in mind that whether considering positional or personal power, you have the ability to affect it in your favor. You actions affect others’ perceptions of you. Those perceptions, in turn, will contribute to how much power they believe you to have.
*Being involved is not the same as micro-managing.
Reardon, K.K. (2001). The Secret Handshake: Mastering The Politics Of The Business Inner Circle. New York: Doubleday.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)